Grassroots Groundswell

Entries from January 2008

Community Adult School

January 25, 2008 · Leave a Comment

The booklet of Spring 2008 course offerings for the North Plainfield Community Adult School is out. It’s not posted online yet, but if you want to get a copy or register for classes, call 908-769-6090 ext. 2185. (The Fall 2007 booklet is here.)

There’s some good stuff in there: substitute teacher training, English as a second language, kickboxing, Zumba fitness, yoga, psychic readings, ballroom dance, Latin dance, driver safety, beginning Spanish, knitting and crocheting, “You’re On the Air (How to Really Make it in Voice-Overs!)”,  Road to Success for recent immigrants (cosponsored by the NP Police Dept.) and more.

Categories: Uncategorized

Voter Turnout

January 25, 2008 · Leave a Comment

The total number of ballots cast in the November 2007 General Election in North Plainfield was 2,432, according to this spreadsheet on the municipal elections (North Plainfield is at page 28 of 41). Other General Election data is here

Citizens interested in working on another initiative petition, like a Shade Tree Commission Ordinance, for example, would need to get at least 243 valid voter signatures on such an initiative petition.

Categories: Uncategorized

Letter to the Editor

January 25, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Antoinette Rinehart’s letter:

Dear Editor:  

In late Spring 2007, a group of concerned citizens met because they were unhappy with the Borough of North Plainfield’s Administration policies and inaction, particularly the Mayor, Council and Planning Board’s planned disposition of the last sizeable portion of land (the 18-acre Villa Maria property) without proper concern for the attendant adverse effects this will place on our community’s future. 

Ultimately, the governing officials’ failure to respond to the legitimate concerns of the community led to our forming North Plainfield Citizens for Community Rights, a community group which educates the public about their rights and inquires into the basis for the Administration’s disregard of the people’s expressed disapproval of their rezoning decision at several well-attended public meetings. 

The Administration’s proposed rezoning favored a condominium developer who sought this parcel to construct high density housing on a historical site representing the oldest medical facility in Central Jersey; one that dates back further to an old Indian trail; and is the home of an awarded New Jersey Champion White Pine, recognized as the best in our State.

It was this deep concern that brought us together and we have since sought to address other problems such as proper enforcement of ordinances that make for a better quality of life in our town.  Throughout the past half-year of activity, we have been consistently forthright, respectful and open in our speech and action. One member of the Borough Council – Mary Forbes – has attended virtually every public Town Meeting we’ve organized; Mayor Janice Allen attended one.  Robert Hitchcock attended one. 

Our recent action was to petition the Borough to place on the ballot an ordinance that would permit the residents and taxpayers the opportunity to decide such major issues. We were forced to file a lawsuit when the Borough Clerk and Borough Attorney rejected our petition signed by at least 650 local residents, not for failure to comply with the formal requirements for initiatives, but because the Borough Attorney believed the proposed ordinance couldn’t be enacted and enforced, despite state law that only a Judge may make such a determination.   

The Court ruled in favor of the Borough government and against the citizens, kicking out the ordinance, but this decision can be appealed.  

Now here’s where it gets interesting.  Following this decision the Borough Attorney has written NPCCR to accuse us of preaching sedition and encouraging the Administration to enact treason for our lawful exercise of our right of initiative, and to threaten harassment of our members. Could this be the start of something really BIG?  

Categories: Uncategorized

Letter to the Editor – Joshua Lambert

January 24, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Following letter was sent to the Courier-News today by Joshua Lambert (full disclosure: he’s my husband).

Other readers are welcome to forward copies of their letters-to-the-editor for posting here.

Recent events in North Plainfield have demonstrated to me the distance between the ideal of “government of the people, by the people, and for the people” that was expressed by Abraham Lincoln and the reality of our representative form of government in the 21st century.  While I have always been somewhat skeptical that our elected officials wanted citizen participation beyond just the act of voting, actions taken by borough officials in response to a citizen-proposed ordinance have clearly demonstrated that as far as my elected officials are concerned, it is my job to vote for them, give them my money, and shut up.

The organization, North Plainfield Citizens for Community Rights (NPCCR), formed around the ideal of increasing citizen involvement in local government and making the local government more responsive to the needs, safety, and wants of the citizenry.  One of NPCCR’s first acts was to draft an ordinance that effectively stripped corporate entities of their legal personhood and made the citizens of North Plainfield the final arbiter of whether a particular corporation could create a new development within the Borough.  Members and friends of NPCCR collected the necessary signatures and asked the Borough to place the proposed ordinance on the ballot as an initiative.  The Borough Attorney declared that the proposed ordinance was discriminatory and that NPCCR, and by inference the citizens of North Plainfield, did not have the right to propose such legislation.  A lawsuit followed in which the judge told the plaintiff, Ms. Katherine Watt, the same thing.  Fair enough.  The matter was adjudicated.  The conclusion being that the rights of an outside corporation trump those of the local citizenry.  This was bad enough, but the threats and intimidation that followed were much worse.

Following the judgement, the Borough Attorney indicated that he would seek court costs from Ms. Watt for filing a frivolous lawsuit and that he might also seek the same from the other members of the NPCCR.  This threat was made in spite of the fact that NPCCR was not the plaintiff and did not appear in the legal briefs filed.  The letter also accused Ms. Watt and NPCCR of sedition and suggested that the group was encouraging North Plainfield officials to commit treason against the state.  The letter was a threat, not about frivolous lawsuits, but about challenging the local power structure.  It was a threat for believing that government should be “of the people, by the people, and for the people.”  It said in no uncertain terms that the role of the citizens in government is to vote, pay taxes, and most of all to accept what your government officials give you (and what they take away).

“Government of the people, by the people, and for the people”.  There was a revolution for that notion, a civil war was fought to preserve that notion, immigrants come to the United States to be part of that notion, and people here live under that notion.  It’s not sedition to suggest that the government live up to that notion.  It’s not treason to suggest that laws need to be changed to bring the reality of the United States system of governing into line with that notion.  I would say, instead, it is treasonous to the memories of those that worked and fought and died to bring that notion into being to suggest that the citizens are not the ultimate arbiter of what is done in their communities and in their names.  It is an act of sedition against the moral foundations of this country to bully and intimidate citizens who ask how are these the acts of a “government of the people, by the people, and for the people?”

Categories: Uncategorized

The Silver Lining of Suburban Sprawl

January 24, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Categories: Uncategorized

Mountaintop Removal

January 24, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Corporate removal of mountaintops to get the coal out is another one of the local self-governance issues that the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund works on with people whose communities have been, and are being, utterly destroyed by the practice.

Here’s a link to an essay by Robert Shetterly on the subject, and also on the inadequacy of words to describe the complete craziness of what we are allowing corporations to do to our whole world in the blind pursuit of profit. The destruction is so rampant, emotions like constructive outrage can rarely be sustained long enough to organize and fight back.

But we do fight back, disorganized and tired, if that’s the best we can muster on any given day.

On December 18 (while our own local ordinance was en route to dismissal – and our own Mayor and Council refused to speak on the subject, let alone support the citizens right to self-governance shielded by that ordinance) the Donegal Township PA Board of Supervisors passed a local ordinance banning corporate mining and stripping corporations of fictional legal “personhood” by a 2 to 1 vote. CELDF press release here.

Here’s a quote from Thomas Linzey, CELDF Executive Director, on Donegal Township becoming the ninth municipality in America to refuse to recognize the legal fiction of corporate personhood within its borders.

“For too long, a handful of powerful men have controlled the fate of communities in Western Pennsylvania, using large corporations to impose surface and longwall mining on people wanting to stop the harms caused by mining in the region. Those few, who benefit from the privileges bestowed on corporations, routinely use State law to preempt municipalities from protecting their residents.  With adoption of this Ordinance yet another Pennsylvania community is exercising the governing authority of community majorities, and eliminating the governing authority of a corporate few.”

I learned about long wall coal mining from some of the local western PA folks affected by it, at the conference I went to in October.

In a lot of ways, long-wall mining serves as a useful metaphor for the destruction of democracy.

In the “old days,” coal mining companies extracting coal from underground were required to leave pillars of coal every so many feet, to maintain support for the earth and homes and streams and farms aboveground.

Then the coal companies decided that that coal was valuable, and that requiring them to leave those support pillars was an unjust state “taking” of private property.

They won that fight, got state endorsement of their corporate right to tear down the coal pillars, and, not surprisingly, homes and businesses and farms and streams and towns aboveground began collapsing as the earth underneath them collapsed.

Long wall mining is the next phase of that practice, where giant machines chew up huge areas of coal underground and the corporations extracting the coal have no responsibility for the destruction their mining causes aboveground. Quote from the Wikipedia entry:

“As the shearer removes the coal, the powered roof supports move forward into the newly created cavity. As mining progresses and the entire longwall progresses through the seam, the cavity behind the longwall, known as the goaf, increases. This goaf collapses under the weight of the overlying strata. This collapsing can lower surface height considerably, causing serious problems like changing the course of rivers and severely damage building foundations.”

Likewise, all the things that could support democracy in the past - a free media that actually covered issues of importance persistently, with facts and context and multiple perspectives; a decent education system that promoted not only basic factual knowledge but critical thinking skills; good jobs that supported families and left people some time and energy for civic participation - have been knocked out from under us.

What we have left are civic and physical landscapes littered with blown-off mountaintops, bulldozed forests, dried up streams, and homes and families and communities with cracked foundations.  

Some quotes from the Shetterly essay.

“…The truth depends on a general respect for the meaning of words. A word is like a seed, an evolutionary artifact, containing in its DNA the fossil memory of precise meaning. Our words today have the same validity that a kernel of corn does after Monsanto has worked its magic. Our words are like pumpkins the day after Halloween — hollowed out, candle-less, the eyes and mouth shrunken, the inside charred. The reason for this is because it always takes courage for people to insist that words maintain their meaning. Words with meaning prohibit the desecration of the irreplaceable…

Our president is correct when he says the Constitution is just a piece of paper. It always will be until legislators and the people have the tenacious courage to demand that the words have meaning. “Democracy”, the word, is merely a stuffed dinosaur in the Political History Museum. Teeth that can’t bite, tail that can’t thrash, no backbone at all. The plaything and mascot of the corporate priests…

Until we insist that our words have meaning (which means that they demand accountability), we might as well make ourselves comfortable thinking that jokes and lies are the same thing. If the words have no meaning, calling attention to the outrage of Mountaintop Removal becomes absurd. A joke. With Profit as god, the truth is a joke, the absurd is sanctified, the self-destructive is ordained…”

Like it or not, believe it or not, that’s what the Villa Maria fight and the whole North Plainfield fight and the whole democracy fight are all about, all rolled into one: “prohibiting the desecration of the irreplaceable.”

Categories: Uncategorized

40-42 Washington Avenue

January 22, 2008 · 1 Comment

40-42 Washington Ave.

Proposal for restoration and community possibilities for the burned Victorian house at 40-42 Washington Avenue, presented to the Borough Council tonight by Dr. Patricia Poitevien LeBlanc and J. Eric Harriz, members of the Historic Preservation Commission’s Subcommittee on the Acquisition and Preservation of 40-42 Washington Ave.

The report gives the history of the home, built in 1872, and outlines a bunch of interesting ideas (plus potential funding sources) for features of a restored home, including an Interactive Local History Museum, Period Craft and Fine Arts Studios, a historical reference and research library, and multi-purpose meeting room – exactly the sort of creative vision North Plainfield needs.

The Council agreed to place the subject on the agenda for the next meeting for further discussion and asked for more data on the current market value of the property “as-is” and a rough estimate of how much it would cost to stabilize the building and prevent further deterioration while the people of North Plainfield put together community support, political will, and funding (grants, donations, loans, etc.) for the restoration project.

Categories: Uncategorized

Environmental Consulting

January 22, 2008 · Leave a Comment

I just found out – throught the annual holiday letter – that a friend of mine has started her own environmental consulting firm.

Too cool.

It’s called McKim Environmental.

Categories: Uncategorized

Letter from Birmingham Jail

January 21, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Antoinette sent this in: timely and relevant, lengthy but well worth a complete read.

 Here’s the link to the full letter, written by Martin Luther King Jr. on April 16, 1963.

“…Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere…”

Categories: Uncategorized

Ray’s Sports Shop

January 21, 2008 · 1 Comment

I got an e-mail from a reader interested in more information about the sale of Ray’s Sports Shop on Route 22. I don’t know much about that – what I heard was that it was to be closed and sold because the owner is retiring. If any readers have more information about pending or completed sales and plans for the property, please send them in for posting.

Categories: Uncategorized