By Emory Layne
Borough Administrator David Hollod has pointed to the educational portion of our total tax bill as the “largest” bite we suffer in our property taxes.
At times, we’ve discussed the closed-door school board “executive sessions” in which administrators’ salaries are set and agreed to. We’ve heard a lot of posturing (and deflection), but never heard straight talk about why we, as the employer, can’t know about this from beginning to end.
When people feel they are making too little, they have no problem with the media reporting on how they’re being underpaid. We’ve never once heard from some group that feels its work is underappreciated who aren’t willing to produce figures to the penny as evidence that they deserve more.
What do people do when the taxpayer finds out how much they’re being paid? They go to court. Back in 2006 when information on the salaries of state and municipal employees was first allowed to be published openly in New Jersey, courts had to eventually decide on the “constitutionality” of whether taxpayers could see what they were paying for.
Fortunately, the courts decided in favor of the taxpayers, but that didn’t stop the grumbling from civil servants, who maintained that they should not be subjected to such transparency.
So what happened when state School Administrators salaries were posted for all to see? According to the New York Times (8/22/2008),
“The day after they were posted, the New Jersey Association of School Administrators filed a lawsuit against the education commissioner, challenging the department’s plans to oversee future superintendent contracts and limit the retirement benefits of top school administrators. The suit, filed in federal court in Trenton, seeks to invalidate the new rules, claiming they violate school administrators’ constitutional rights by arbitrarily denying them equal treatment and due process.”
The poster child for abuses in administrative compensation, of course, was Keansburg’s Barbara A. Trzeszkowski. A retirement package of $740,876 had been included in her contract, on top of her annual compensation of $189,379. She most certainly wasn’t the only one, just the biggest one. The data showed that there are administrators all over the state with huge dollar figures due them when they retire.
But that’s not my concern here, simply because a retirement package is a one time payment. You can only retire from a district once (I hope). Unlike a salary, this is NOT an annual figure.
Now, I understand that Keansburg residents would be upset that when their superintendent retired, a big fat check for three-quarters of a million bucks would be stapled to the official proclamation thanking her for her services. And she wasn’t the only one, just the largest. Some of the other numbers that jump off the “have a nice retirement” page at you are Dr. Antonio Lewis in Asbury Park ($292,416); Dr. James Habel in Wall Township ($221,242); Peter Miller from Somerset Hills Regional ($217,396); Kathleen Sleezer from Parsippany/Troy Hills (an assistant superintendent) at $143,045; and even Dr. Philip Heery in tiny Egg Harbor Township at $113,558.
North Plainfield does not show such retirement payouts to its school administrators, an observation I must qualify by noting that school districts report the compensation data themselves. There is not, as yet, any comprehensive system of checks and balances to ensure 100% accurate reporting of all compensation. We can only hope we’re being told the whole truth.
My concern lies in salaries, because these are year-in and year-out bills the taxpayers foot.
Even in this area, there’s usually some tomfoolery. Boards who authorize salaries, and educators who earn them, talk about “base salary,” overlooking annual allowances, bonuses, stipends, insurance payments and reimbursements.
I include them.
When someone feels that someone isn’t getting enough of something, they produce all kinds of charts and graphs and statistics to ‘prove’ their point to us.
In this case, I personally had to go and crunch the numbers, because, by gosh, with all these computer geniuses and financial experts and management consultants in this state, no one bothered to work out a ranking when it came to administrative salaries in education in New Jersey.
There are 616 school districts in New Jersey. Taking the salary and related compensation for all school superintendents in the state (but not using the retirement pay, which, as noted, is a one-time payment), guess where North Plainfield’s schools superintendent ranks?
How about NUMBER 33! Dr. Marilyn Birnbaum’s $233,285 annual compensation is in the top 6% of superintendents in the state. The WHOLE state.
(more…)