“Congratulations North Plainfield,” April 7, will mark 2 full years that the completion of construction at Borough Hall is overdue.
In the contract signed by The Borough of North Plainfield and the Dauti Construction Co.Inc. of West Orange, N.J. it was agreed that the construction/renovations, of the municipal complex, be completed 378 consecutive calendar days after the notice to proceed was signed. This notice to proceed was signed March 24, 2006. According to this contract the work should have been completed around April 7, 2007. On April 7, 2009 we will celebrate the second anniversary of a series of in my opinion, poor decisions made by North Plainfield that leaves us with the construction still not completed. One of these poor decisions has to do with not having a penalty clause in the contract. With a penalty clause the contractor would have to make some type of financial compensation for each day that exceeded the agreed on completion date,unless there were extenuating circumstances,ineptness is not considered and extenuating circumstance.
It is a common practice on multimillion dollar constructions jobs, such as this one, for a fiscally competent purchaser to include a penalty clause, that is probably why Norh Plainfield did not have one.
Another poor decision by the Borough was not to collect on the $3,999,500.00 performance bond that the Dauti Construction Company secured from the Great American Insurance Company of Cincinnati, Ohio (bond # 4583439). When posting a performance bond the contractor agrees to adhere to the provisions of the contract it has with the purchaser. It was pretty obvious after the first 6 months of attempted construction, by the contractor, that the 378 completion date would not be met. But the North Plainfield decision makers made no attempt to collect the performance bond so that someone more competent could complete the job before our second anniversary of non completion.
It is interesting to note that it took 420 days to complete construction of the Empire State Building. Construction started March 1930, and was completed May 1931. Apparently a choice of competent contractors, and a series of good decisions made by the property owners brought the successful completion of this magnificent edifice to such a rapid completion.
Second Anniversary Of Unfinished Construction At Borough Hall – Frank D’Amore
April 7, 2009 · 5 Comments
Categories: Uncategorized
5 responses so far ↓
Morgansh // April 8, 2009 at 3:19 pm |
what an unbelievable disgrace!
How is this incompetence allowed to continue?!?!
Barbara Habeeb // April 8, 2009 at 5:46 pm |
When I was on the Council, I had asked Eric Bernstein why we haven’t tried to collect on the Bond, and his comment was “all building will stop.”
My question is, hasn’t it stopped anyway? We should have gotten the money and hired someone else. I believe the time limit to collect has expired. Now it’s void, if I am correct on this.
Greg Hatala // April 9, 2009 at 10:35 am |
somehow I’m reminded of an old line from “Ball Four” by Jim Bouton; when asked why he didn’t buy more Gatorade, the clubhouse manager replied “If I buy it, you guys will just drink it up!”
So, let me see — we HAVE a performance bond, but if we ry to collect on it, “All work would stop.” Isn’t that a GOOD thing if we’re dealing with contractors et al who can’t finish a job anywhere near on time or on budget?
Mr. Bernstein, if some guy was fixing your car, and kept charging you more and more and taking longer and longer to finish it, would you keep paying him because, if you didn’t, “all work would stop?”
Borough Hall consistently referred to or treated residents as if they (the residents) were ignorant and Borough Hall denizens were geniuses. “You just don’t understand” is a common bleat. Oh, we understand. We understand very well.
Answer me this — how can I get a job that pays $200,000 a year and all I have to do is come up with ridiculous answers like that when asked a question by a councilperson? You know, a councilperson — someone who speaks for the TAXPAYERS instead of someone who gets hired by a mayor, retained by the next one, and we can’t touch?
Barbara Habeeb // April 10, 2009 at 6:27 pm |
Any comments from the Council on this?
Barbara Habeeb // April 13, 2009 at 11:02 am |
I know that Larry LaRonde is not afraid to speak his mind. I hope he will continue to respond to some of the comments and questions people have asked on this blog. I just fear that he has been advised not to write on this blog anymore. That would be a shame.
I’d also like to hear from newcomer Everett Merrill. I’d like to see if we are all on the same page when it comes to these important issues. It would be nice to actually see the “transparency” and “open communication” that Mike Giordano talked about when he was running for Mayor.
Again, I’m not trying to be disrespectful. I just wish that the Mayor and Council would be a little more open and forthright with the public. It is not a lot to ask of our elected officials, is it?