At the borough council meeting last night, POP Realty Corporation president Paul Gaglioti expressed grave concern about his company’s increased tax burden for property they own along route 22, following North Plainfield’s revaluation. The property is on the west side of Route 22 (where Blockbuster used to be), next to the former Ray’s sporting goods store. Mr. Gaglioti admitted some negligence in providing paperwork to Appraisal Systems, Inc. in order to assist them in assessing the value of the property. That may have affected the outcome. However Mr. Gaglioti was surprised that, based on a market determination, his property could have doubled in value to more than $3 million. The 14,000 sqft property now has a tax burden of $10 per sqft, up from $5 per sqft in 2006. The tax burden alone exceeds advertised total sqft pricing of like properties along route 22 in other towns and Mr. Gaglioti fears there will be no interest from ’quality’ tenants, as long as the property cannot be rented at a fair market price.
Former councilwoman Barbara Habeeb commented that the borough should investigate possible tax incentives to attract new business, in addition to retaining current ones. Great idea, but unless the borough can truly achieve significant tax savings, the tax burden could just shift back to the homeowner.
The borough believes the extensive development planned for the Villa Maria site will bring in much needed tax revenue. What is still left unanswered is how much that development will cost the borough in terms of additional services and what will actual be left to alleviate the currently over-taxed homeowners and businesses. Given the large number of ‘for sale’ signs and growing list of foreclosures, the additional development may only replace what revenue is being lost. BUT, with the unfortunate consequence of lowering existing home values by adding unnecessary housing stock. And once that last piece of open space is developed, where do we go from there? The standard method of raising revenue through development doesn’t work anymore for North Plainfield.
There exists another potential consequence for the taxpayer, with the regard to the timing of North Plainfield’s revaluation:
A month or two after the revaluation was completed, the housing market collapsed and a few months after that, the commercial market tanked. Homeowners are understandably freaked out that the new assessed value of their home may exceed a fair market price and that they’re now being unfairly over taxed. However, the amount of property tax one pays is not based on individual home value, but on how one’s property value compares with all the others in town. The purpose of the revaluation was to re-balance the tax burden based on an updated market comparison of the properties in the borough. If you look at the results of simple poll we did on the blog, similar number of residents saw increases and decreases in property tax. As long as the same ‘market determination’ was used for each assessment, a fair share of the tax burden should be achieved.
Since the collapse of the market, a significant number of appeals have been made and are going to made. If all those appeals result in lower assessments, the tax burden is going to shift again. Part of the town’s properties could be based on the lower market values of the current economic condition, while those that don’t appeal would remain evaluated against last year’s inflated market. Ouch, so much for equality. Don’t hardwire those check amounts, just yet!
Hal Hirsch (co-editor)