Grassroots Groundswell

Entries from September 2009

CDC Issues Artifical Turf Health Advisory – submitted by Mark Williams

September 28, 2009 · 12 Comments

Mark will be submitting additional posts on this topic (ed. note)

In response to test results by the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services (NJDHSS) on artifical turf fields in New Jersey the CDC issued a health advisory on June 18th, 2008. In addtion to the background story on what prompted the testing by NJDHSS and limts/scope of testing, there were recommendations for testing artifical turf and general recommendations on the use of fields with Artifical Turf.

 

This is an official

CDC HEALTH ADVISORY

Distributed via Health Alert Network

Wednesday, June 18, 2008, 16:10 EDT (4:10 PM EDT)

CDCHAN-00275-2008-06-18-ADV-N

Potential Exposure to Lead in Artificial Turf:

Public Health Issues, Actions, and Recommendations

 

Public Health Issues

 

In the course of conducting a routine health investigation at a metal facility in Newark, NJ, the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services (NJDHSS) and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) tested a nearby community athletic field for lead contamination. Samples taken from the field showed high levels of lead in the field dust, but the lead did not come from the scrap metal facility.

 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is partnering with its sister-agency, ATSDR, to monitor this situation because of CDC’s expertise in lead poisoning prevention.

 

After determining that the lead source was the artificial turf, NJDHSS began to test other artificial turf fields looking for similar high lead levels in artificial turf fibers. These findings raised concerns about potentially high lead levels in artificial turf used in other locations including fields and playgrounds. NJDHSS tested a limited sample of athletic fields in New Jersey. Any questions regarding the specific fields tested should be directed to NJDHSS.

 

As determined by NJDHSS, limited sampling of additional athletic fields in New Jersey and commercial products indicates that artificial turf made of nylon or nylon/polyethylene blend fibers contains levels of lead that pose a potential public health concern. Tests of artificial turf fields made with only polyethylene fibers showed that these fields contained very low levels of lead.

 

Information provided by NJDHSS to CDC and ATSDR indicates that some of the fields with elevated lead in either dust and/or turf fiber samples were weathered and visibly dusty. Fields that are old, that are used frequently, and that are exposed to the weather break down into dust as the turf fibers are worn or demonstrate progressive signs of weathering, including fibers that are abraded, faded or broken. These factors should be considered when evaluating the potential for harmful lead exposures from a given field.

 

The risk for harmful lead exposure is low from new fields with elevated lead levels in their turf fibers because the turf fibers are still intact and the lead is unlikely to be available for harmful exposures to occur. As the turf ages and weathers, lead is released in dust that could then be ingested or inhaled, and the risk for harmful exposure increases. If exposures do occur, CDC currently does not know how much lead the body will absorb; however, if enough lead is absorbed, it can cause neurological development symptoms (e.g. deficits in IQ). Additional tests are being performed by NJDHSS to help us better understand the absorption of lead from these products.

 

In general, children less than 6 years old are more likely to be affected by lead than adults because of increased contact with lead sources in the environment, including lead contaminated house dust and soil. Children also absorb lead more easily. Children’s developing nervous systems are also more susceptible to the adverse health effects of lead including developmental delay and behavioral problems.

 

It should be emphasized that although turf testing has been limited to the state of New Jersey, no cases of elevated blood lead levels in children have been linked to artificial turf on athletic fields in New Jersey and elsewhere. Concerned parents should talk to their child’s pediatrician about potential and known sources of lead in their children’s environment and whether their children should have a blood lead test. This is a simple blood test that is paid for by most private insurers and by Medicaid.

 

NJDHSS has asked the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to investigate this potential problem and CDC and ATSDR are currently waiting for information from CPSC to help guide future public health recommendations and actions.

 

Interim Public Health Actions Related to Testing Artificial Turf Products and Reducing Potential Exposures to Lead

 

NJDHHS’s testing of artificial turf fields was limited and only sampled turf containing nylon. Since NJDHHS, CDC and ATSDR did not test fields composed of substances other than nylon and nylon/polyethelene blend, we do not know if lead is also a component in other types of artificial turf. Additionally, not necessarily all turf made of nylon contains elevated amounts of lead.

 

CDC has long recommended the elimination of all nonessential uses of lead. Because it is unclear whether all artificial turf contains lead at this time, CDC and ATSDR only recommend testing artificial turf fields that appear worn or weathered.

As a precaution, until further guidance is available from CPSC and until we have more information about the absorption of lead from artificial turf products and its capability of harm, CDC and ATSDR recommend:

 

• Testing turf that has fibers that are abraded, faded or broken, contains visible dust, and that is made from nylon or nylon-blend fibers. Information about testing is provided later in this alert.

• If the dust contains more than 400 ppm lead, do not allow turf access for children under the age of 6 years.

• If access is restricted, care should be taken to ensure that alternative sites contain lead levels less than 400 ppm.

• Not testing turf made from polyethylene-only fibers. This recommendation is based on currently available data.

• Not testing turf made from nylon or nylon blends that is not worn and does not contain visible dust. These fields should be routinely monitored for wear and dust generation.

• Replacing fields as soon as practicable if worn and dusty, as a precautionary measure.

 

CDC recommends testing children’s blood lead levels in accordance with state guidelines. Concerned parents/caregivers should consult their medical providers for further information.

 

General Recommendations on the Use of Fields with Artificial Turf

 

At this time, CDC does not yet understand the potential risks associated with exposure to dust from worn artificial turf. The following precautions can be taken to minimize any potential risk.

 

• Field managers should consider implementing dust-suppression measures. Suggestions for dust-suppression methods can be found at NJDHSS’s website, which is provided in the additional information section.

• Children ages 6 and younger are most susceptible to lead’s harmful health effects. To protect the public, in particular young children, consider posting signs indicating that:

1. After playing on the field, individuals are encouraged to perform aggressive hand and body washing for at least 20 seconds using soap and warm water.

2. Clothes worn on the field should be taken off and turned inside out as soon as possible after using the field to avoid tracking contaminated dust to other places. In vehicles, people can sit on a large towel or blanket if it is not feasible to remove their clothes. These clothes, towels, and blankets should be washed separately and shoes worn on the field should be kept outside of the home.

3. Eating while on the field or turf product is discouraged.

4. Avoid contaminating drinking containers with dust and fibers from the field. When not drinking, close them and keep them in a bag, cooler, or other covered container on the side of the field.

Categories: Uncategorized

North Plainfield Borough Council Meeting – Monday, Sept. 28th

September 27, 2009 · Leave a Comment

BOROUGH OF NORTH PLAINFIELD

AGENDA

COUNCIL AGENDA CONFERENCE MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2009

NORTH PLAINFIELD COMMUNITY CENTER 7:30 p.m.

614 GREENBROOK ROAD, NORTH PLAINFIELD, NJ

ROLL CALL:

Council Members: Mary H. Forbes Robert E. Hitchcock

Lawrence La Ronde

Everett Merrill

Frank Righetti

Douglas M. Singleterry

Frank “Skip” Stabile, Council President

Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag

Moment of Silence for the Men and Women Serving in Our Armed Forces

Statement of Compliance as to Notice of Meeting

PUBLIC COMMENT

General public comments shall be limited to five minutes for each individual.

(Rule 29 of the Borough Council’s Rules of Order)

NEW BUSINESS:

 

1. Agreement with Timothy Hoffman Inc. for Real Estate Appraisal –

D.E.H.

2. Authorizing Birdsall Engineering re: extension of limits to Sycamore

Avenue improvements – D.E.H.

REPORTS OF BOARDS, COMMITTEES, COMMISSIONS

ADJOURNMENT

 

BOROUGH OF NORTH PLAINFIELD

 

AGENDA

REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2009

(Following the 7:30 p.m. Agenda Conference)

 

NORTH PLAINFIELD COMMUNITY CENTER

614 GREENBROOK ROAD, NORTH PLAINFIELD, NJ

ROLL CALL

 

Council Members: Mary H. Forbes

Robert E. Hitchcock

Lawrence La Ronde

Everett Merrill

Frank Righetti

Douglas M. Singleterry

Frank “Skip” Stabile, Council President

Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag

Statement of Compliance as to Notice of Meeting

PUBLIC COMMENT

General public comments shall be limited to five minutes for each individual.

(Rule 29 of the Borough Council’s Rules of Order)

APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES:

 

Agenda Conference & Regular Meeting of February 9, 2009

Agenda Conference & Regular Meeting of February 23, 2009

Roll Call

APPOINTMENT BY MAYOR TO BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS REQUIRING COUNCIL CONFIRMATION:

LIBRARY ADVISORY COMMITTEE – Unexpired term:

JANICE G. ALLEN

CONSENT AGENDA

 

Statement by Council President

RESOLUTION:

Mrs. Forbes:

09-28-09-01 Approving the Consent Agenda Roll Call

CONSENT AGENDA RESOLUTIONS:

 

a. Confirming the appointment of Janice G. Allen as member to Library Advisory Committee

b. Authorizing agreement with Timothy Hoffman Inc. for Real Estate Appraisal

c. Authorizing Birdsall Engineering re: extension of limits to Sycamore Avenue road

improvements

d. Expressing sincere best wishes to Joan Graham

e. Expressing sincere thanks to Alex Kuga

 

f. Authorizing Municipal Court to change monetary amount of Change Fund

g. Authorizing the Treasurer to refund certain escrow balance

h. Authorizing the Treasurer to refund certain tax sale certificates

i. Authorizing North Plainfield Exempt Firemen to conduct Charitable Solicitation in

Roadways

j. Approving the Consolidated Bill List of September 28, 2009

k. Calling for Executive Session re: Personnel and Labor Negotiations

COMMUNICATIONS:

Superior Court of New Jersey

Somerville, NJ Re: 2009-2010 Annual Visitation of the North Plainfield Municipal Court

North Plainfield Board of Education Re: Letter of Approval of EMS Services During Athletic Contests

Mayor Michael Giordano Re: Call of Meeting for Special Meeting on September 21, 2009

James S. McGarry, Jr.

North Plainfield, NJ

Re: Memo to Board of Adjustment Members About the Crystal Ridge Club’s Application

Birdsall Services Group

Cranford, NJ Re: Public Notification: Sensitive Population & Resource Checklist Former Bristol Motors/East Coast Nissan Site, 545-555 Route 22 West

Law Offices of S. P. DiFazio

Flemington, NJ Re: Pasquerello v. North Plainfield, et al.

Groundwater & Environmental Services, Inc.

Neptune, NJ Re: Notification of Environmental Remedial Activities Newspaper Advertisement

Practical Environmental Solutions, LLC

Washington, NJ Re: Notification Letters

Re: Sensitive Population and Resource Checklist

State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection

Trenton, NJ Re: Conditional No Further Action Letter and Covenant Not to Sue with Requirements for Biennial Certifications

State of New Jersey, Department of Law and Public Safety, Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control Re: Mailing Address Change for the Corporate Offices of Ruby Tuesday in Alabama

Motiva Enterprises LLC

Bedminster, NJ Re: Notification and Public Outreach 340 Watchung Avenue and Rt.22

New Jersey State League of Municipalities Re: Reminder of COAH Briefing

Re: Reminder: COAH Regional Briefing – September 24, 2009

Re: Information About the 94th Annual League Conference

Tax Court of New Jersey Re: Case Information Statement for 5 Mountain Avenue

Re: Case Information Statement for 607 Somerset Street

Re: Case Information Statement for 481-95 Highway 22

Re: Case Information Statement for 190 Greenbrook Road

Re: Case Information Statement for 20-24 Steiner Place

Re: Case Information Statement for 135 Somerset Street

AccuTech Environmental Services, Inc.

Keyport, NJ Re: Public Notification Requirements Former VIP Honda, 536-542 Somerset Street

Lindabury, McCormick, Estabrook & Cooper, P.C.

Westfield, NJ Re: North Plainfield Citizens for Community Rights v. Borough of North Plainfield

Gwendolyn J. Korman, Planning Board Clerk

Green Brook, NJ Re: Notice of Public Hearing on the Housing Element and Fair Share Plan of the Green Brook Township 2006 Master Plan

Unico National

South Plainfield, NJ Re: Invitation to the Plainfields’ Chapter UNICO’s Annual Columbus Day Ceremony on Monday, October 12, 2009 at 9:00 am

REQUESTS FOR AGENDA ITEMS

PUBLIC COMMENT

COMMENTS BY MAYOR, ADMINISTRATOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS

RECESS

EXECUTIVE SESSION:

1. Personnel & Labor Negotiations – E.M.B.

RECONVENE

RESOLUTION:

Mr. Hitchcock:

09-28-09-02 Action taken on Tina Totten separation Roll Call

 

Mr. La Ronde:

09-28-09-03 Action taken on Fire Officers’ Negotiations Roll Call

 

ADJOURNMENT

Categories: Uncategorized

Upper Krausche Field Replacement – submitted by Mark Williams

September 27, 2009 · 1 Comment

“UPPER KRAUSCHE FIELD REPLACEMENT”

with ARTIFICAL TURF

Mark Williams

 

As the completion date for the replacement of Upper Krausche Field

draws near the safe use polyethylene fiber surface remains up for debate in New Jersey and other parts of the country. Over the next few weeks I will present, here on the pages of the Grassroots Groundswell, information as to the pros and cons of this type of field. I invite others to participate in this information sharing endeavor so we are all well informed.

 

New Jersey Investigation of

Artificial Turf and Human

Health Concerns

Why is the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services studying

artificial turf fields?

 

April 2008

 

The New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services (NJDHSS) and the federal

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry/National Center for Environmental Health (ATSDR/NCEH) were investigating a contaminated scrap metal facility in the city of Newark, NJ. One of the contaminants at the facility was lead. The facility is next to an athletic field. At the time of the investigation the NJDHSS and ATSDR/NCEH saw children playing on the athletic field. Because lead is hazardous to young children the NJDHSS collected samples from the athletic field to find out if lead from the scrap metal facility was migrating to the field. The samples were tested in a laboratory, which found that there were high levels of lead in the dust. However, the source of the lead was the artificial turf fibers, not the scrap metal facility. Because of the finding of lead in this field, the NJDHSS began to test other artificial turf fields

 

Read more… http://www.state.nj.us/health/artificialturf/documents/lead_in_turf_factsheet.pdf

Categories: Uncategorized

Candidates Night Hosted by NPCCR 10/20/09, 7pm

September 27, 2009 · 1 Comment

The North Plainfield citizens for Community Rights. (NPCCR), a non partisan group of citizens, will be hosting another ‘Meet the Candidates’ night on Tuesday, October 20, 7:00 P.M. at the North Plainfield Community Center 614 Greenbrook Rd. at Clinton Ave. The candidates running for the council seat in North Plainfield, Everett Merrill and Jim McGarry, have been invited to meet the public and to address any questions or concerns they have.

All residents of the borough are encouraged to attend.  Any reader of this blog can also email questions to communityrights@gmail.com and the hosts will try to present them at the meeting. The meeting will be recorded and the audio will be posted on the blog.

For more information contact Frank D’Amore at 908-757-6353 or email frankdsr@comcast.net

Categories: Uncategorized

Voter Registration Deadline is October 13th

September 16, 2009 · 10 Comments

In order to be eligible to vote in this year’s November elections, you must register to vote by October 13th. Voter registration forms are available at the North Plainfield municipal building, 263 Somerset St.

Categories: Uncategorized

2009 Budget Amendment

September 15, 2009 · Leave a Comment

There will be a public hearing on September 21, 2009 at North Plainfield Community Center 614 Greenbrook Rd at 7:30pm with regard to the budget amendment resolution 09-14-09-01. The resolution consists of adjustments to the 2009 budget (see below). Audio. Presume questions and answers will be handled at the public hearing.

Resolution 09-14-09-01 (page 1)

 

Resolution 09-14-09-01 (page 2)

Categories: Uncategorized

New Jersey Law Enforcement Accreditation Commission will arrive in North Plainfield

September 15, 2009 · Leave a Comment

ACCREDITATION. A team of assessors from the New Jersey Law Enforcement Accreditation Commission will arrive in North Plainfield on Sept. 21 to examine all components of the police department’s policies, procedures, management, operations, and support services.

The accreditation program requires police agencies to comply with modern police standards in four basic areas: policy and procedures, administration, operations, and support services.

Every three years, commission representatives come to the North Plainfield Police Department to confirm that the department meets the accreditation standards.

The assessors will be taking comments from the public by phone between 10 a.m. and noon Sept. 22 at 908-963-1571. Comments are limited to five minutes and must address the accreditation standards. A copy of the standards is available at the borough clerk’s office and posted on the police department’s Web site http://www.northplainfield.org/NPPD/index.htm . For more information, contact Lieutenant Joe Mack at 908-769-2926.

Chief William Parenti said North Plainfield is one of 34 departments in the state that have achieved accreditation. There are 541 municipal police departments in New Jersey.

Source: Central Jersey police departments.

Categories: Uncategorized

Open Government Symposium – submitted by Mark Williams

September 15, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Help hold our government accountable.

Join us for the New Jersey Foundation for Open Government’s Open Government Symposium Friday, September 25.

New Jersey Comptroller Matthew Boxer, the keynote speaker, will discuss how his office’s audits and reviews will help bring transparency to New Jersey’s government.

Experts will also discuss the unfulfilled promise of the Government Records Council (GRC), created as a quick route to obtain basic open records, but not given the funding, staff or independence to serve justice to its mission.

WHAT:

Open Government Symposium

WHEN:

9:30 a.m. – 12:30 p.m.

Friday, September 25

WHERE:

State Capitol Complex

Committee Room 6

125 West State St., Trenton

CONTACT:

Call 908-418-5586, e-mail info@njfog.org or register with our form today

Categories: Uncategorized

Comcast License Up For Renewel – Special Agenda Meeting TBA

September 14, 2009 · 3 Comments

At tonight’s Borough Council meeting, a representative from Comcast presented a statement and took questions from the council and public. While attendance was light, one resident asked numerous questions about Comcast’s intentions regarding rate increases, programming changes and the chance that Comcast will start charging for the ‘required’ digital box. The resident also asked about the status of available competition.

Councilwoman Forbes asked the Comcast representative about providing equipment in order to video tape council and board meetings and airing them on the public access channel. The representative stated those requests would be open for negotiation. 

The council proposed having a special agenda meeting, whereby more members of the public can have the opportunity to present questions or comments about Comcast service. That agenda session would assist the council in handling renewal negotiations. It was unclear if a representative of the Comcast would be available. The date of the special meeting should be available at the next council meeting and we’ll post the date on the blog.  If any resident cannot make the special agenda meeting and would like to ask a question or make a comment regarding Comcast’s service, you can email it to communityrights@gmail.com with the subject line ‘Comcast’. We’ll try to present those emailed questions/comments as best we can.

Categories: Uncategorized

NPCCR-Are Leadership’s Strategies Helping or Hurting? – submitted by Mark Williams

September 11, 2009 · 16 Comments

Last week I attended the September meeting of NPCCR. I had attended only one meeting since resigning my postion as Co-Chair of NPCCR back in April. The focus of the meeting was “You have a problem, tell us”. The recent drafting of the NP Sunshine Act, by NPCCR, and the very creatable, articulate and passionate plea by petitioners Rinehart and Gatto (who also represent NPCCR leadership) for the passage of the act by the Borough Council has rekindled my interest. I had hoped for some follow-up conversation regarding the group’s next step in defeat, but there was none. During my 90 min. at the meeting I noted little change from past meetings I had participated in as an observer.

 

Attendees reported on quality of life issues around the Borough, speculated on causes and complained about Borough leadership’s lack of “aggressive” enforcement of Borough ordinances. Remember now, the theme of the meetings was to identify a Borough quality of life issue and NPCCR would offer suggestions on how to resolve it. Got that? The primary solution offered by NPCCR to the attendees was for them to file complaints with the appropriate authorities and wait for a response. If no response is forthcoming in a reasonable amount of time, come to Borough Council Meetings and voice your complaints, “where you will be ignored”, stated NPCCR leadership. Or, come to an NPCCR meeting and voice your frustration in a welcoming environment but where you will be offered no real solutions except to go to Borough Council meetings where you can listen to the usual suspects complain to Borough Council and be ignored. Everyone in the room knows the suggestions/complaints are not going to be taken seriously because no one from the Borough Council or Mayors office is listening anyway, Right?

 

Why is NPCCP leadership advising people to take their concerns to Borough leadership when NPCCR is frequently critical of the methods used, by the Borough, to resolve citizen complaints and often dissatisfied with the outcomes? Why would NPCCR send people to participate in a system that they themselves profess is corrupt and has no interest in resolving the real issues that plague NP and who need to “brush off their manners”? Seems like a contradiction to me.

 

One side says aggressive enforcement is the answer the other side says they are doing a good job. This fantasizing that “aggressive” enforcement of Borough ordinances will really resolve the issues without increasing the payroll is just that, a fantasy. Continuing to evaluate the NPDPW work as good is a joke as well. We don’t want good, we want better than what is. The Borough leadership is going to do what its going to do, what as citizens are we willing to do and how will NPCCR lead?

 

The “other towns do it, why can’t we” aggressive enforcement mentality continues to stifle creative thinking. The creative, outside the box thinking that could propel NPCCR forward as a major force for change in the Borough. A force for change in terms of an organizing workforce that supplements Borough resources by being an active part of the solution as well as a grassroots watchdog organization that holds Borough Leadership accountable to the citizens of the Borough.

 

It appears by the actions/non-actions of NPCCR leadership that come hell or high water the tactic of calling Borough leadership on the carpet for having “bad manners”, accusing them of corrupt behavior and nepotism, for being self-serving and drafting the occasional petition will be the only strategies employed in an effort to bring, what NPCCR says, is needed reform to the Borough.

 

I would stack just about any member of the NPCCR Founders/Core group up against any member of the Borough Council and Mayors office in terms of passion and intellect. Both believe they know the most effective method for achieving what is best for the Borough. I strongly believe that both can accomplish good things for the Borough independent of each other and in partnership. So, what’s the difference between the two groups? One group has actualized its power and the other group has yet to realize its power potential.

 

NPCCR, stop formulating your strategies based on the expectation that Borough leadership should or will listen meaningfully to what you have to say, it’s what you believe anyway. Stop expecting that they will ever act meaningfully on any suggestion that you offer; you will never give them credit for compromising because you should never have had to work so hard for it in the first place…”arrogant Borough council”!

 

NPCCR is well into its third year and they have accomplished a few things both as a grassroots organization and as a de facto representative of the community. What they have not done is established a solid organizational infrastructure that has a solid strategy for getting beyond what NPCCR leadership professes to be a pervasive pattern of disrespect for the citizens of North Plainfield by their elected representatives. As Ms. Rinehart has so often stated “NPCCR is in the embryonic stage of development…we like things lossey goosey”. That is so true and it shows!

 

It shows; with no formally published/distributed by-laws for dues paying members or potential members seeking information. It shows; with no formal minutes kept of NPCCR agenda or public meetings in the spirit of transparency. It shows with the inability of NPCCR leadership to speak with one united public voice in the spirit of “unifying the diverse voices of North Plainfield citizens”.

It shows with the failure to:

Regularly obtain and disseminate public records on government activities;

Effectively plan and implement solutions to local problems;

Continuously seek constructive dialogue with Borough officials;

Regularly publish a news and opinion blog to share factual information and diverse opinions on local issues.

The existence of groups such as NPCCR and the important work they do can be of great benefit to a community when the leadership is strong; motivates others from within and outside of the group, communicates clearly, thinks creatively, navigates change successfully, and manages conflict. In the absence of these qualities the groups exist to serve multiple personal agendas with results such as those that occurred at the special council meeting of August 27th, the passing of a “toothless” version of the Sunshine Act by the Borough Council. One has to ask, to what degree does the “adversarial” posture of NPCCR leadership towards Borough leadership contribute to the absence of citizen advisory boards on important issues, community forums and other less formal gatherings of stakeholders. In turn, Borough Council and the Mayor’s office must also embrace the fact that involvement of citizens in the work of government is not just limited to voting. They want to expand that role by being involved to the making of public policy and the decision making process. No one group alone can solve all the problems.

Categories: Uncategorized